Details about package xchpst
Name: | xchpst |
---|---|
Uploader: | Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> (Debian QA page) |
Description: | xchpst - eXtended CHange Process STate |
Package uploads
Upload #2
Information
Version: | 0.2.1-1 |
---|---|
Uploaded: | 2025-01-07 18:26 |
Source package: | xchpst_0.2.1-1.dsc |
Distribution: | unstable |
Section: | admin |
Priority: | optional |
Homepage: | https://gitlab.com/abower/xchpst |
Closes bugs: | #1092288 |
Changelog
xchpst (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #1092288)
QA information
-
–
Package uses debhelper-compatDebhelper compatibility level 13
-
–
Package is the latest upstream version
Local: 0.2.1 Upstream: 0.2.1 Url: https://gitlab.com/abower/xchpst.git/ refs/tags/v0.2.1 -
–
Package is not native
Format: 3.0 (quilt) -
–
"Maintainer" email is the same as the uploader
-
–
Package is lintian clean
-
–
Package closes ITP bug
-
–
No VCS field present
-
–
Package is not in Debian
-
–
d/copyright is in DEP5 format
Upstream Contact: Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> Licenses: Expat
Comments
No comments
Upload #1
Information
Version: | 0.2.0-1 |
---|---|
Uploaded: | 2025-01-06 22:56 |
Source package: | xchpst_0.2.0-1.dsc |
Distribution: | unstable |
Section: | admin |
Priority: | optional |
Homepage: | https://gitlab.com/abower/xchpst |
Closes bugs: | #1092288 |
Changelog
xchpst (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #1092288)
QA information
-
–
Package uses debhelper-compatDebhelper compatibility level 13
-
–
Package is the latest upstream version
Local: 0.2.0 Upstream: 0.2.0 Url: https://gitlab.com/abower/xchpst.git/ refs/tags/v0.2.0 -
–
Package is not native
Format: 3.0 (quilt) -
–
"Maintainer" email is the same as the uploader
-
–
Package is lintian clean
-
–
Package closes ITP bug
-
–
No VCS field present
-
–
Package is not in Debian
-
–
d/copyright is in DEP5 format
Upstream Contact: Andrew Bower <andrew@bower.uk> Licenses: Expat
Comments
-
In order to prevent issues that slow this package down at a later stage, I wonder if I may seek some advice in advance? The binary package includes a script (xchpst.fake) and man page (xchpst.fake.8) in the _documentation_ that are intended to be donated to another package (runit) once this one is accepted to support degraded operation for users of this new facility when xchpst is not installed. Lintian doesn't complain but might these be unwelcome anyway in the binary package doc area? Furthermore, these are dual licenced as BSD-3 in order that the donee package can incorporate them without carrying an additional licence type. Would it be preferable to remove these from the xchpst binary package entirely and separately donate them under the second licence to the intended donee package?
Andrew Bower at Jan. 7, 2025, 9:22 a.m. -
I've addressed my own question pre-emptively... new upload incoming imminently with these files removed from the binary package to keep the story simple!
Andrew Bower at Jan. 7, 2025, 5:27 p.m.