Details about package electrum-personal-server
| Name: | electrum-personal-server |
|---|---|
| Uploader: | Manuel Guerra <ar.manuelguerra@gmail.com> (Debian QA page) |
| Description: | electrum-personal-server - Maximally lightweight electrum server for a single user |
Package uploads
Upload #1
Information
| Version: | 0.2.4+ds-1 |
|---|---|
| Uploaded: | 2025-12-18 17:42 |
| Source package: | electrum-personal-server_0.2.4+ds-1.dsc |
| Distribution: | unstable |
| Section: | utils |
| Priority: | optional |
| Homepage: | https://github.com/chris-belcher/electrum-personal-server |
| Vcs-Browser: | https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum-personal-server |
| Vcs-Git: | https://salsa.debian.org/cryptocoin-team/electrum-personal-server.git |
| Closes bugs: | #1122095 |
Changelog
electrum-personal-server (0.2.4+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release. (Closes: #1122095)
QA information
-
–
Package uses debhelper-compatDebhelper compatibility level 13
-
–
A watch file is present but doesn't work
Warnings: debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file;
please upgrade to a higher version
(see uscan(1) for details).
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Version: 5
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Template: GitHub
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Owner: chris-belcher
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Project: electrum-personal-server
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Dversion-Mangle: auto
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Repack: yes
there appears to be a version 2 format line in
the version 1 watch file debian/watch;
Have you forgotten a 'version=2' line at the start, perhaps?
Skipping the line: Repacksuffix: +ds -
–
Package is not native
Format: 3.0 (quilt) -
–
The uploader is in the package's "Uploaders" field
-
–
Package has lintian warningselectrum-personal-server source
-
W
missing-debian-watch-file-standard
- [debian/watch]
-
P
maintainer-manual-page
- [debian/electrum-personal-server.1]
-
P
silent-on-rules-requiring-root
- [debian/control]
-
W
missing-debian-watch-file-standard
-
–
Package closes ITP bug
-
electrum-personal-server:
- #1122095 (Wishlist, ITP): ITP: electrum-personal-server -- Maximally lightweight electrum server for a single user
-
electrum-personal-server:
-
–
Package is not in Debian
-
–
Upstream-Contact missing from d/copyright
Upstream Contact: None Licenses: Expat, GPL-2
Comments
-
-
The fact that the package uses standards 4.7.2 doesn't mean it's defective or needs modifications. The Debian development cycle is slow, and the 4.7.3 standards are very recent. The new policies need to be studied before being implemented hastily. Besides, it's obvious that there's a transition from standards version 4.7.2 to 4.7.3, and that's perfectly fine. I don't see any defect in this. Please do not mark the package as needing modifications again for this reason.