Details about package anytree
Package uploads
Upload #2
Information
Changelog
anytree (2.12.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update standards version
Comments
No comments
Upload #1
Information
Changelog
anytree (2.12.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add project name to pyproject.toml (closes: #1094065)
Comments
-
Mitchell,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project.
This review is offered to help package contributors to Debian mentors improve their packages (where needed) prior to possible sponsorship into Debian by a Debian Developer.
Review...
1. Build:
* pbuilder [1]: Good
* sbuild [2]: Good
2. Lintian [3]: Issue
Running lintian...
N:
I: anytree source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.6.2 (released 2022-12-17) (current is 4.7.0)
N:
N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that
N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the
N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating
N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field
N: appropriately.
N:
N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't
N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control
N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload
N: the package.
N:
N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the
N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of
N: Policy.
N:
N: Please refer to
N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for
N: details.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: fields/standards-version
N:
I: Lintian run was successful.
3. Licenses [4]: Good
4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good
5. Build Twice (build source after successful build) [1]: Good
6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good
Note: This test does not block sponsorship and is for information only at this time. It is good if a package passes this test.
7. Tail of the ratt (architecture dependant packages only) [6]: N/A
Note: This test does not block sponsorship and is for information only at this time. It is good if a package passes this test.
8. Install [No previous installs]: Good
9. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good
Additional...
A. Please consider importing your project to Debian Salsa. This would allow for better review and collaboration.
Summary...
Package looks good, but it would be nice to review and update to the latest Denian standards version.
Please try the below on your packages...
[1] pbuilder:
* Command for 1.: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Command for 5.: sudo pbuilder build --twice <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
[2] sbuild:
* Command: sbuild -d unstable <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
[3] lintian:
* Command: lintian --display-info --verbose --fail-on error --info --pedantic --show-overrides (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian
[4] lrc:
* Command: lrc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon
Note: Please report false positives as bug reports against 'licenserecon'.
[5] reprotest
* Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto-build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
* Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
[6] ratt
* Command: ratt --dist=<YOUR_DISTRIBUTION> <PACKAGE>_<VERSION>-<DEBIAN_REVISION>_<ARCHITECTURE>.changes
* Document: https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/ratt/ratt.1.en.html
Regards
Phil
Needs work
Phil Wyett at Jan. 28, 2025, 5:56 a.m.